Gerrard's Insurance · lead → client · 26 May – 26 Aug 2026 · gerrards-crm synced 26 Aug 14:13 · generated 2026-08-26 14:43 NZ
Kynwin sits just below the team, but not by enough to call it. 15.0% against 17.8% over the window, z = −1.1, p = 0.27 — that is well inside noise. He has been within a couple of points of the field in three of the four months, and in August he beat it (15.2% vs 13.0%).
The real change is not his rate, it is his volume: 129 leads in May, 115 in June, then 64 in July and 66 in August. His flow roughly halved and never came back, at the same time Dean and Caitlin were ramping. His call activity did not drop with it — he is still making 23–58 calls a week — so this looks like a routing change, not disengagement.
Worth a closer look: 0 of 5 client referrals converted, against a team rate of 47% on the same lead type. Five is far too few to conclude anything, but referrals are the highest-intent lead the business gets, and a zero there is worth asking about rather than averaging away.
Rolling window smooths weekly noise. Kynwin tracks the team line closely for most of the window, dips through July, and closes back at parity. Dots are individual weeks, sized by lead volume.
Note the volume column as much as the rate — his lead flow halved between June and July while his conversion held roughly steady.
| Month | Leads | Won | Kynwin | Team | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May mostly pre-window | 129 | 20 | 15.5% | 18.9% | -3.4 |
| June | 115 | 18 | 15.7% | 21.9% | -6.2 |
| July | 64 | 7 | 10.9% | 19.2% | -8.3 |
| August | 66 | 10 | 15.2% | 13.0% | +2.2 |
Kynwin is near the team on untagged web leads and ahead on phone. The referral rows are too thin to score, but the zero on client referrals is flagged in the read above.
| Lead source | n | Kynwin | Team | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (no source tag) | 167 | 13.8% | 15.2% | -1.4 pts |
| Phone Call | 12 | 33.3% | 29.6% | +3.7 pts |
| Client Referral | 5 | 0.0% | 47.4% | n too small |
| Professional Referral | 2 | 0.0% | 29.2% | n too small |
Three systems count August differently, and only one describes leads a human actually worked. The lead-distribution service barely covers Kynwin at all — it recorded 9 rows for him in August, every one of them never delivered to GHL.
| Count | August | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| Whole business — GHL contacts | 436 | Every new lead, all sources, all brokers |
| Kynwin — GHL assigned | 66 | The denominator used here. Leads GHL says are his |
| Kynwin — lead-dist rows | 9 | 9 distinct · 9 never delivered to GHL |
client won contact tag, not opportunity status. Won opportunities are deleted from the GHL pipeline, so status understates wins by roughly 4× from May 2026.broker_earnings stopped at 22 Jun 2026 and conversions holds zero won rows, so a $500 policy counts the same as a $50k one.opportunities.first_contacted_at is NULL on every row in this database.enquiries.assigned_broker_id as a lead count. It is a shadow routing decision that matches real GHL assignment about 27% of the time, and it double-counts via the CRM tee.| Week | Kynwin | All brokers |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | 38 | 257 |
| 2026-06-08 | 26 | 400 |
| 2026-06-15 | 54 | 395 |
| 2026-06-22 | 30 | 421 |
| 2026-06-29 | 12 | 516 |
| 2026-07-06 | 28 | 418 |
| 2026-07-13 | 31 | 518 |
| 2026-07-20 | 23 | 557 |
| 2026-07-27 | 29 | 607 |
| 2026-08-03 | 37 | 557 |
| 2026-08-10 | 27 | 611 |
| 2026-08-17 | 58 | 699 |
| 2026-08-24 | 11 | 369 |